Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17230 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2004 16:27:36 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2004 16:27:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 12549 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2004 16:27:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12479 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2004 16:27:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12411 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2004 16:27:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dd2020.kasserver.com) (81.209.148.130) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Feb 2004 16:27:05 -0000 Received: from vafer.org (p50865BD2.dip.t-dialin.net [80.134.91.210]) by dd2020.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176D378B36 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:27:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <403E1F14.20900@vafer.org> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:30:12 +0100 From: Torsten Curdt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: USQL [was: Future of XSP and ESQL] References: <001801c3faa6$c9295470$1e01a8c0@WRPO> In-Reply-To: <001801c3faa6$c9295470$1e01a8c0@WRPO> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >>First, let's collect what we like about the two components > > > It would be very cool if we could provide something that helps with flow > applications. > I like the combination of OR-Mapping/CForms/Flow but this > is for many beginners overkill. They shouldn't be forced to write Java > code e.g. in order to implement a simple register form. ...I see no reason why you could not use a possible new USQL for easy flow stuff. But first we need to find out what we like about one or the other. Why do *you* e.g. use ESQL rather the SQLTransformer or the other way round? Or why do *you* use the DatabaseActions... Things like that -- Torsten