Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 83167 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2004 19:16:38 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2004 19:16:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 92509 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2004 19:16:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 92444 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2004 19:16:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 92375 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2004 19:16:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dd2020.kasserver.com) (81.209.148.130) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2004 19:16:15 -0000 Received: from vafer.org (pD9E2DBF2.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.219.242]) by dd2020.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A125EB4A for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:16:16 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <403A5239.70400@vafer.org> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:19:21 +0100 From: Torsten Curdt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030925 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004 References: <20040223041901.B12963@lyra.org> <403A144A.5040602@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <403A144A.5040602@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >> - All releases made after March 1 must use the new Apache License 2.0. >> Please note that this applies to *all* releases, even maintenance >> releases where the original went out under the 1.1 license. >> Please see http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html for more >> information on applying the license. Shall we tackle the update this week? >> * In conjunction with the the discussion about relicensing and some >> copyright issues, the Board is establishing an official policy in this >> area: >> - each and every file must have exactly *one* Copyright line, >> specifying >> The Apache Software Foundation. additional individual or corporate >> copyrights are not allowed. >> (of course, binary files or certain restrictively formatted files >> cannot include the copyright and license, but the copyright/license >> header should be in everything possible) Does this mean we have to have the full licence in each file ...or is the one and only copyright line good enough - if there is a reference to the licence? >> - author tags are officially discouraged. these create difficulties in >> establishing the proper ownership and the protection of our >> committers. there are other social issues dealing with collaborative >> development, but the Board is concerned about the legal ramifications >> around the use of author tags We had quite a discussion about this... ..so remove the author tags on the same update? WDYGT -- Torsten