Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93933 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2004 20:16:26 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2004 20:16:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 81526 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2004 20:16:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 81471 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2004 20:16:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 81454 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2004 20:16:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out004.verizon.net) (206.46.170.142) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2004 20:16:12 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([4.40.114.87]) by out004.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040221201616.TRDN8186.out004.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:16:16 -0600 Message-ID: <4037BC61.9000205@verizon.net> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:15:29 -0800 From: Christopher Oliver User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Java continuations with joeq References: <13EA8488-648C-11D8-8E8F-000393CFE402@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <13EA8488-648C-11D8-8E8F-000393CFE402@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out004.verizon.net from [4.40.114.87] at Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:16:16 -0600 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Le Samedi, 21 f�v 2004, � 17:13 Europe/Zurich, Christopher Oliver a > �crit : > >> ...I did some informal tests and it appears to actually be slower >> than interpreted Rhino (not sure exactly why, perhaps because Rhino >> bytecodes are higher level), but was significantly faster than >> BeanShell (which is a Java source code interpreter). > > > Is it a lot slower, do you think it would make a significant difference? > >> 2) It has an LGPL license. > > > Means we might have to talk its author into changing the license, it > wouldn't be the first one ;-) > > Note also an interesting comment of Geert Bevin on Steven's weblog at > http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/archives/001745.html, he says > "I'll soon have added support for continuations with Groovy in RIFE too" > > From what I've seen Groovy looks like a very nice and fairly complete > scripting language, which also has an ASF-like license. > > So, if Groovy is really close to have continuations, we might want to > wait or help? > Groovy itself doesn't have any support for continuations. In RIFE this is provided by the RIFE framework (however, RIFE doesn't appear to support general continuations in Java). Chris