Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37063 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 23:05:33 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 23:05:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 13278 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2004 23:05:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 13212 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2004 23:05:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 13197 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2004 23:05:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Copernicus) (4.4.125.218) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2004 23:05:16 -0000 Received: from tycho ([192.168.0.3] helo=coyotegulch.com) by Copernicus with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1AuJhx-0001pj-46; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:05:21 -0500 Message-ID: <403692B3.7020107@coyotegulch.com> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:05:23 -0500 From: Scott Robert Ladd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Noels CC: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: The (new) Jisp 3.0 license References: <323ACCDB-63AC-11D8-8ECD-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> <403644F9.907@coyotegulch.com> <780AD494-63F2-11D8-9FA9-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> In-Reply-To: <780AD494-63F2-11D8-9FA9-000A958B684A@outerthought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm going to consider some of the philosophical ramification this weekend; I have a 3.1 version of Jisp in the Wings, and I can always relicense it. One issue that I did want to address: Steven Noels wrote: > I'm intrigued though by the questions you receive about Jisp from the > Apache side: do these originate from Cocoon users? While Jisp is > considered a core (though switchable) part of Cocoon (it's the default > of two cache implementations), its existence is shielded from the > passing eye of a normal user. Also, we would expect that Jisp issues > within Cocoon would be reported on the Cocoon lists, which happens, but > not regularly enough to suspect people to come and nag you directly. Or > is it because of other ASF projects using Jisp? I don't know the precise origin (within the Apache framework) of the questions; I do know that, since last fall, three separate companies contacted me about Jisp, based on their discovery of it in the Apache code base. In one case, the company paid me a small amount to help them try to win a contract with a Big Bank; their bid failed, though not due to Jisp. They used Jisp for a purpose similar to that of Cocoon. The other two companies approached me with similar propisitions; for some reason both were incapable of some rather simple extensions of Jisp required for their own commercial projects. Since both were in a rush, and I'm always looking to make new customers, I jumped in and wrote what they asked for; neither paid me, and one was quite rude about the affair. After the above experiences, I relicensed Jisp under the GPL. I am open to being convinced that another license would be more beneficial. ..Scott -- Scott Robert Ladd Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com) Software Invention for High-Performance Computing