Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47346 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2004 11:30:09 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2004 11:30:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 22893 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2004 11:29:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 22870 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2004 11:29:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 22846 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2004 11:29:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.nada.kth.se) (130.237.222.202) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2004 11:29:49 -0000 Received: from nada.kth.se (cvap80.nada.kth.se [130.237.218.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.nada.kth.se (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i1DBU2pt002869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:30:02 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <402CB53A.5030203@nada.kth.se> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:30:02 +0100 From: Daniel Fagerstrom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 X-Accept-Language: sv, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Woody scratchpad area References: <35393.10.0.0.5.1076569972.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> <402BE58E.2010001@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <402BE58E.2010001@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ... > I also think it's a good idea to considering solidifying the form > methodology by: > > 1) removing XMLForms entirely (they have been deprecated for a while > now) +1 > 2) deprecating JXForms (a vote is already in place, this counts as +1 > to that) +1 > 3) moving Woody inside cocoon core and rename it Cocoon Forms (we > should stop calling it woody) +1 for renaming -1 for moving to core, for the same reasons as Joerg, Bruno and Bertrand ;) > For people that expected Cocoon 2.2 to make this happening, well, I > think we should get it done in Cocoon 2.1.5 instead. > > WDYT? I think we need to make a detailed review of the core interfaces and the XML-formats before renaming it to Cocoon Forms. Maybe we have gathered enough experience of Woody to be able to do that now. /Daniel