Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82401 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 01:00:06 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 01:00:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 61814 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2004 00:59:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 61772 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2004 00:59:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 61756 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 00:59:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host.leverageweb.com) (64.91.254.192) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 00:59:45 -0000 Received: from va-leesburg-cmts5c-90.chvlva.adelphia.net ([67.21.159.90] helo=leverageweb.com) by host.leverageweb.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AoBda-00029h-Tk for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:15:31 -0500 Message-ID: <402043D2.2030107@leverageweb.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:58:58 -0500 From: Geoff Howard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [CForms] Changing the JXPathBindingBase.java References: <401EB84B.9010700@gmx.de> <20040202210051.GC9973@keow.org> <4020416D.9000409@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4020416D.9000409@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.leverageweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cocoon.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - leverageweb.com X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joerg Heinicke wrote: > On 02.02.2004 22:00, Tim Larson wrote: > >> BTW, I think there should be a check in each binding to make sure the >> widget is of the required type. Perhaps JXPathBindingBase should supply >> a method that the bindings could call to perform this check? > > > Sounds good. At the moment there are to many unexact error messages not > helpful for the users. The NPE was one example. The "strong typing" for > the widgets seems to be a good thing too. > > (I wonder why nearly nobody seems to care about Woody at the moment. Are > you all so much sunk in work at the moment?) for me, yes. and too far behind on woody to comment meaningfully (not in any way implying that any of my other comments are actually meaningful...) Geoff