Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66663 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2004 13:52:42 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 13:52:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 15125 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2004 13:52:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 15042 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2004 13:52:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 15000 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2004 13:52:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2004 13:52:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 20223 invoked by uid 50); 27 Feb 2004 13:52:59 -0000 Date: 27 Feb 2004 13:52:59 -0000 Message-ID: <20040227135259.20222.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27249] - You cannot lookup components on a disposed ComponentLocator exception X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27249 You cannot lookup components on a disposed ComponentLocator exception ------- Additional Comments From bdelacretaz@codeconsult.ch 2004-02-27 13:52 ------- > So this seems to be solely related to the parsing of the XML > comment containing the CVS version info. hmm..if you remove the $Id$ keyword, CVS won't do any change to the file when doing the commit, so the problem is not necessarily related to the comments. I was more thinking of the way used by CVS to update the file (some sequence of file open / write / close / file date change) which causes Cocoon's "file change detection" to do something funny. It might be interesting to look at the debug messages related to how the sitemap.xmap change is detected by Cocoon.