Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63342 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2004 21:36:07 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2004 21:36:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 2335 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2004 21:34:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 2236 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2004 21:34:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 2179 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2004 21:34:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO keow.org) (69.41.247.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2004 21:34:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 11926 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Feb 2004 21:35:37 -0000 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 21:35:37 +0000 From: Tim Larson To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: cforms model/binding cache Message-ID: <20040202213537.GE9973@keow.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I modified the JXPathBindingManager to cache form binding definitions. Since both the formmodel (via the DefaultFormManager) and the binding prefix the keys that they place in the cache, they could both use the same cache and share their Source-related code. Anybody want to tackle this? --Tim Larson