cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "DURDINA Michal" <Michal.Durd...@assetsoft.sk>
Subject RE: [Portal] Question: Why JSR-168 portlet impl moved?
Date Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:29:19 GMT
Thanks for pointing me there. 

Inspite of that, my questions remain:
1. Why must I be dependent on the whole portal block (jar is 330kB and will be more) when
I want to implement just one JSR-168 portlet using Cocoon and using 3rd party portlet container?
2. What was the reason for not moving that code to src/java?

Thank you and appologize me :)

Michal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 4:04 PM
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Portal] Question: Why JSR-168 portlet impl moved?
> 
> 
> See:
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107718576400005&r=1&w=2
> 
> Thanks
> Carsten 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: DURDINA Michal [mailto:Michal.Durdina@assetsoft.sk] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:58 PM
> > To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> > Subject: [Portal] Question: Why JSR-168 portlet impl moved?
> > 
> > Hi,
> > I am curious why Carsten moved portlet implementation from 
> > scratchpad to portal block... I thought JSR-168 portlet 
> > implementation would go to core.
> > 
> > I think that CocoonPortlet (JSR-168 portlet implementation) 
> > and portal block are two different things. 
> > 
> > CocoonPortlet makes cocoon applications work under portlet 
> > container (i.e. Jakarta Pluto). 
> > Portal block IS a portlet container (Portal Engine makes 
> > environment for coplets and portlets).
> > 
> > So I don't see the reason why to mix these two.
> > 
> > Why must I be dependent on the whole portal block (jar is 
> > 330kB and will be more) when I want to implement just one 
> > JSR-168 portlet using cocoon? I supposed that JSR-168 portlet 
> > implementation would go to core, where other env 
> > implementations are (Servlet and CLI). What was the reason 
> > for not doing so?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Michal
> > 
> > BTW: Tiny patch for CocoonPortal.java is now in Bugzilla #27188
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________ Informacia od NOD32  __________
> 
> Tato sprava bola preverena antivirusovym systemom NOD32.
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message