Stephan Coboos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in some discussions I'd heard that actions and XSP should be more and
> more replaced by flowscript. I think, this is a good idea because
> flowscript is a good way to integrate logic parts into an application.
> But with one thing I cant agree. Why shouldn't it be possible to
> return to the sitemap without sendPage? I had read some discussions
> about the decision, throwing a Exception if no sendPage existst within
> a flowscript but I think this decision was wrong.
>
> In our current project we have to create some Beans from a Database.
> After that, this beans should be integrated into the actual pipeline,
> but this is not possible because a return after the flowscript is not
> possible so we have to use Actions instead brrrr....
>
Why do you have to use actions?
> This is not possible but would be very very nice:
>
> <map:match pattern="listProducts">
> <map:generate type="file" src="products.xml"/>
> <map:call function="readProductBeans"/>
> <map:transform type="jxt"/>
> <map:transform type="xslt"/>
> <map:serialize/>
> </map:match>
Um, how much harder is this:
<map:match pattern="listProducts">
<map:generate type="file" src="products.xml"/>
<map:call function="readProductBeans"/>
</map:match>
<map:match pattern="listProducts-result-pipeline">
<map:generate type="jxt"/>
<map:transform type="xslt"/>
<map:serialize/>
</map:match>
|