cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vadim Gritsenko <va...@reverycodes.com>
Subject Re: FW: [proposal] Cleaning up our component library
Date Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:43:38 GMT
Bruno Dumon wrote:

>On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 08:43, Ralph Goers wrote:
><snip/>
>  
>
>>We'd love to use Woody (aka Cocoon Forms), but if it can be used without
>>FlowScript it isn't obvious.  So we will be using the
>>SimpleFormTransformer etc., for the forseeable future.
>>    
>>
>
>Woody doesn't require flowscript. While flowscript integration is
>available (and this way of working is most pushed for obvious reasons),
>the native API of Woody is still just a bunch of Java. The Woody samples
>show how to process a form from an Action, for example.
>

Amen.

I'd been using Woody with Action written in Java for some time. Worked 
well till I tired of modifying it too often to change flow.

Vadim


Mime
View raw message