cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <>
Subject RE: Flow or actions?
Date Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:58:06 GMT
To add my two cents, FWIW...

We chose not to use Flow for the same reason we don't use XSP or JSPs; it is
too easy to start adding business logic where it doesn't belong.  Actions
make it very difficult to perform business logic in the wrong place (i.e -
the presentation tier).  Unfortunately, although we'd also like to use Woody
(Cocoon Forms) but it seems that if it isn't directly tied to FlowScript
that the documentation of it is.


-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Hartmann []
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:15 AM
Subject: Re: Flow or actions?

Rolf Kulemann wrote:


> AFAIK people like flow, because you do not need to recompile (anything)
> when updating flow script. 

But on the other hand (AFAIK) there's no IDE support
for auto completion etc. in the javascript. This is a
big drawback. Any ideas how to improve this?

-- Andreas

View raw message