cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <Ralph.Go...@digitalinsight.com>
Subject RE: Flow or actions?
Date Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:58:06 GMT
To add my two cents, FWIW...

We chose not to use Flow for the same reason we don't use XSP or JSPs; it is
too easy to start adding business logic where it doesn't belong.  Actions
make it very difficult to perform business logic in the wrong place (i.e -
the presentation tier).  Unfortunately, although we'd also like to use Woody
(Cocoon Forms) but it seems that if it isn't directly tied to FlowScript
that the documentation of it is.

Ralph

-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Hartmann [mailto:andreas@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 5:15 AM
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flow or actions?


Rolf Kulemann wrote:

[...]

> AFAIK people like flow, because you do not need to recompile (anything)
> when updating flow script. 

But on the other hand (AFAIK) there's no IDE support
for auto completion etc. in the javascript. This is a
big drawback. Any ideas how to improve this?

-- Andreas

Mime
View raw message