Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77457 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 15:18:50 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2003 15:18:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 12821 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2003 15:18:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12785 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2003 15:18:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 12730 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 15:18:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.s-und-n.de) (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2003 15:18:26 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id AF741F8258 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:18:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.46]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003121216182658:82654 ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:18:26 +0100 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Strange db directory Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:19:29 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <3FD9D507.6070508@verizon.net> Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 12.12.2003 16:18:26, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 12.12.2003 16:18:27, Serialize complete at 12.12.2003 16:18:27 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > >Now, I think the source factory is wrong place because the db could > >run on a different host/different jvm. So perhaps an on xindice server > >component that gets this configuration? > > > > > > That's what I tried to avoid - one more component... And for this > component, we will have to create another block, "xindice", right? > ...nice thing about embedded driver is that you just call it and it > creates DB... > Hmm, ok, can we use the "force-property" parameter in web.xml? Carsten