Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67473 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 09:25:19 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 09:25:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 76973 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2003 09:24:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 76936 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2003 09:24:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 76922 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 09:24:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.s-und-n.de) (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 09:24:50 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 31885E99D0 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:25:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from hw0386 ([192.168.2.31]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003120510245947:61865 ; Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:24:59 +0100 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Compatibility Issues with 2.2 Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:25:57 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3FCF4574.3030903@verizon.net> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 05.12.2003 10:25:00, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 05.12.2003 10:25:01, Serialize complete at 05.12.2003 10:25:01 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N So, is anyone against reverting back to Recyclable? If not, I will do it in the next days. Carsten > -----Original Message----- > From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:32 PM > To: dev@cocoon.apache.org > Subject: Re: Compatibility Issues with 2.2 > > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > > > > >>I've got couple of questions... > >>(1) Was Recyclable deprecated or not? > >> > >> > >afaik, no. > > > > > > > >>(2) Can we implement both? > >> > >> > >> > >This could be a dangerous road, I think. What should happen if > >a component implements both? > > > > > > You are asking me??? Ask the guys who invented Resettable! :) > > Vadim > >