Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48259 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 14:21:31 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 14:21:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 72655 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2003 14:21:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 72487 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2003 14:21:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 72474 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 14:21:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.s-und-n.de) (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 14:21:24 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id 0162FE78E2 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:21:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from hw0386 ([192.168.2.31]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003120415212341:59773 ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:21:23 +0100 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Compatibility Issues with 2.2 Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:22:21 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3FCF39B9.10206@verizon.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 04.12.2003 15:21:23, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 04.12.2003 15:21:24, Serialize complete at 04.12.2003 15:21:24 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > I've got couple of questions... > (1) Was Recyclable deprecated or not? afaik, no. > (2) Can we implement both? > This could be a dangerous road, I think. What should happen if a component implements both? I think one is enough :) Carsten