Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Status of 2.2 - Continuing?
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:58:41 +0100
Message-ID: <84F0A43A4248CE45B5C0E20F4C40779C600A51@naomi.webworks.nl>
Thread-Topic: Status of 2.2 - Continuing?
Thread-Index: AcPCNiWBuGmTVc4XTOmHaf678HK0xQACWonQ
From: "Unico Hommes" <Unico@hippo.nl>
To: <dev@cocoon.apache.org>

=20

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
>=20
> As the tree processor is the central component that is=20
> required to run cocoon and as we currently just can't start=20
> 2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we should see=20
> that we get a runnable 2.2 asap.
>=20
> What do you think about just installing the tree processor from 2.1?
> This version should work in 2.2 and while someone is=20
> concentrating on the treeprocessor for 2.2, all others can=20
> start with whatever they want (e.g. blocks).
>=20

I was planning on working on the tree processor for 2.2 next week and
during the holidays. I've been extremely busy at work for the past few
weeks (am in the office right now) but this will be over after
tomorrow's deadline.

I don't know how long it's going to take me to get the tree processor
into a workable state. The changes that need to be made are extensive so
there will be a test period after things start to work as well. I'd say,
I'll probably be able to put in enough time to get it working over Xmas.

I'm +1 on your proposal of installing the tree processor from 2.1 if you
think this will get you started on blocks sooner than that. Else I'd
advise to wait a little bit more. If we do revert to 2.1 tree processor
we will need to move the work I have been doing componentized tree
processor over to a different package.

Thoughts?

Unico