Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17370 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 11:53:50 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 11:53:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 89555 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2003 11:53:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 89346 invoked by uid 500); 23 Dec 2003 11:53:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 89331 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2003 11:53:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out005.verizon.net) (206.46.170.143) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Dec 2003 11:53:45 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([208.185.179.12]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20031223115345.PGMU16040.out005.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 05:53:45 -0600 Message-ID: <3FE82CBE.2040308@verizon.net> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 06:53:34 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Cocoon 2.2: does it even build? References: <84F0A43A4248CE45B5C0E20F4C40779C71AD29@naomi.webworks.nl> In-Reply-To: <84F0A43A4248CE45B5C0E20F4C40779C71AD29@naomi.webworks.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [208.185.179.12] at Tue, 23 Dec 2003 05:53:44 -0600 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Unico Hommes wrote: >It's been totally broken for a long time. There are a few areas where it >will break ATM. Treeprocessor, I18nTransformer (due to deprecation of >MirrorRecorder) and some XSP stuff. > > I thought I merged all the necessary changes to the 2.2 branch... Isn't it the case? Vadim