Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48396 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2003 04:52:02 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2003 04:52:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 80054 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2003 04:51:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 80012 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2003 04:51:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 79985 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2003 04:51:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host.leverageweb.com) (64.91.254.192) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Dec 2003 04:51:38 -0000 Received: from [134.205.205.241] (helo=leverageweb.com) by host.leverageweb.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AUmgO-0001Xa-3b for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:46:12 -0500 Message-ID: <3FD9B5FE.9090506@leverageweb.com> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 07:35:10 -0500 From: Geoff Howard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: CVS broken (was: Re: Moved ParanoidCocoonServlet to its own block) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.leverageweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cocoon.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - leverageweb.com X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >>Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >> >>>I just added an empty directory to cvs - and now it builds again :) >>> >>> >> >>Thanks. But why does the build *need* a "conf" directory? >> > > Don't know :) I guess it's because we don't check if the "conf" directory > exists before we apply the xconfpatch tool. Is that where the error occurred in building? If so, it's easy to fix. Geoff