Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57129 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 03:00:37 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 03:00:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 16063 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2003 03:00:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 16013 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2003 03:00:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 16000 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2003 03:00:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web41905.mail.yahoo.com) (66.218.93.156) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2003 03:00:15 -0000 Message-ID: <20031203030024.86904.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.223.134.160] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 19:00:24 PST Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:00:24 -0800 (PST) From: Timothy Larson Subject: Re: Xerces 2.6 bug (was Re: Build failure because of proxy-firewall) To: dev@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: <3FCD4D7B.2070200@leverageweb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- Geoff Howard wrote: > So, do we > 1) Ignore the bug until a later version of xerces is released? (the bug > is that the build fails without an internet connection due to the dtd > resolving in web.xml) > 2) Roll back to 2.5? (I assume this would unfix other bugs?) > 3) Use a dated version of xerces from cvs until their next release. > > WDYT? Just for your information, my first test must have been in error, because my setup now works with just the rollback to version 2.5, just like, IIRC, Bruno reported. Unless there are fixes we need in 2.6, I tend toward just rolling back to 2.5 until the next xerces release (option #2). If anyone requires 2.6, then option #3 would be my second choice. Lets not scare off any developers behind firewalls or on trains :) --Tim Larson __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/