Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35839 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2003 15:40:12 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Dec 2003 15:40:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 52650 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2003 15:40:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 52598 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2003 15:40:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 52575 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2003 15:40:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gate2.stjude.org) (192.55.208.12) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Dec 2003 15:40:04 -0000 Received: by gate2.stjude.org; (8.9.3/1.3/10May95) id JAA1073481; Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:40:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC097D53@SJMEMXMB04.stjude.sjcrh.local> From: "Hunsberger, Peter" To: Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 09:40:04 -0600 Subject: RE: [heads up!] JClark does it again! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Dec 2003 15:40:05.0181 (UTC) FILETIME=[33BF96D0:01C3CA34] X-SEF-723560E2-3392-41F8-A983-A3F5486E94A: 1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-Topic: [heads up!] JClark does it again! Thread-Index: AcPJ1CUrjN5E9BD5Rh2RLXLdxYDStgAXyxzA X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi : >=20 > On 23 Dec 2003, at 18:32, Andrew Savory wrote: >=20 > > On 24 Dec 2003, at 01:53, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > >> We are escaping the gravitational attraction of XMLSchema.. slowy, > >> but we are. > > > > To a "published" standard that you have to pay for? No thanks! >=20 > So, let's see, you would much rather have all your CD burner vendors=20 > come up with their own specification on how to burn CDs much=20 > like DVDs=20 > did? or wait, you want a non-ISO way to encode dates? or to encode=20 > charsets? or country code and names? >=20 > should I continue? >=20 > Yes, ISO documents are payware. Did this prevent people from=20 > implementing a ISO-9660 file system driver to read CD-ROMs? There's been a fair amount of discussion about this on xml-dev. As far as I understand it (and my understanding is rudimentary at best) you only have to pay if you are redistributing licensed material, not to use the standards themselves. For example, you can embed ISO country codes in a program without incurring costs, but if you provide a way for the end user to export and reuse the country codes a license cost would be incurred.