Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87099 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 11:48:11 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 11:48:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 74732 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2003 11:48:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 74575 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2003 11:48:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 74562 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 11:48:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www2.kc.aoindustries.com) (65.77.211.84) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 11:48:07 -0000 Received: from dialup-213.146.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au (dialup-213.146.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au [203.220.146.213]) (authenticated) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBACnMe20544 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:49:22 -0600 Subject: Re: whitespace cleanup and efficiency drive From: David Crossley To: dev@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: <3FD7002D.60306@gmx.de> References: <1068439948.19378.8025.camel@ighp> <3FB18B1D.3090204@virbus.de> <1068707676.19378.20040.camel@ighp> <3FB37B9C.7040508@verizon.net> <1069149413.29598.667.camel@ighp> <1071033857.1237.24458.camel@ighp> <3FD7002D.60306@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1071056877.1236.25612.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 10 Dec 2003 22:48:01 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Joerg Heinicke wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > > > Okay, i now have the cocoon-2.2 CVS completely clean of > > any dos2unix problems. > > > > Now we are not going on a witch-hunt or anything, but ... > > Not a witch-hunt, but name the people. They must know it, that something > is broken. I for example use Eclipse and WinCVS. I can at least imagine > that a problematic constellation can be using cvs from cygwin, so you > have a mixture of Linux/Windows tools. I am not sure who they are yet. After a while i will run the tests again and we will see. Gradually we will alleviate the problems. --David