Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-52408-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38717 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 22:43:15 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 22:43:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 48756 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2003 22:42:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 48735 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2003 22:42:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 48720 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 22:42:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailgate.fujitsu.com.au) (216.14.192.226)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 22:42:58 -0000
Received: from mailhost.fujitsu.com.au (mailhost.fujitsu.com.au
 [137.172.19.140])
	by mailgate.fujitsu.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952603BD00
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Wed,  3 Dec 2003 09:43:04 +1100 (EST)
Received: from Viruswall (mailhost.fujitsu.com.au) with ESMTP� id hB2Lhhm01624
Received: from fast.fujitsu.com.au (fast.fujitsu.com.au [137.172.210.51])
	by mailhost.fujitsu.com.au (8.11.7/8.11.3) with ESMTP id hB2LhhE01618
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:43:43 +1100
Received: from alexk ([137.172.75.235])
	by fast.fujitsu.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA32041
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:43:11 +1000
Message-ID: <006801c3b925$988e3190$eb4bac89@alexk>
From: "Alex Kovacs" <alexk@fast.fujitsu.com.au>
To: <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
References: <20031202190646.48116.qmail@web41904.mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: CocoonForms server sizing?
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:42:41 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

> Thanks for answering.  Do you have any idea of the timeline till
benchmarks?
> Not intending any pressure on you, I am just trying to estimate if I can
> afford to wait or not.

We plan to start benchmarking pretty soon and finish by 15th Dec or so.

> > BTW, woody's widget output type has a flow. If one is using output for
the
> > widget styling in the form template, the output fields cause the data to
be
> > lost in the xml or bean model. I think what happens is that the binding
will
> > try to map a non existent <input> field and will set the value to null
or
> > empty string. What we did to solve this problem was to change the
> > woody-field-styling.xsl for the output type as follows:
>
> In the binding file did you use readonly="true" for the output widgets?

No we did not. But I will try to see how it works. Thanks for the tip.
Alex