Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
From: "Reinhard Poetz" <reinhard@apache.org>
To: <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Compatibility Issues with 2.2
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 13:24:14 +0100
Message-ID: <000c01c3bb2a$b2c28960$8200000a@WRPO>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3FD077AF.4010701@leverageweb.com>
Importance: Normal

see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&w=2&r=1&s=recyclable+rese
ttable&q=b
(especially Berin's comments)

Cheers,
Reinhard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Howard [mailto:cocoon@leverageweb.com] 
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 1:19 PM
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Compatibility Issues with 2.2
> 
> 
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > So, is anyone against reverting back to Recyclable?
> > If not, I will do it in the next days.
> 
> I thought there was a deeper difference than semantic but 
> assumed that someone (Berin?) would pipe in and explain.
> 
> If you've looked into it carefully and think that's it, I 
> agree with you.
> 
> Geoff
> 
> > 
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net]
> >>Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:32 PM
> >>To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> >>Subject: Re: Compatibility Issues with 2.2
> >>
> >>
> >>Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I've got couple of questions...
> >>>>(1) Was Recyclable deprecated or not?
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>afaik, no.
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>(2) Can we implement both?
> >>>>
> >>>>   
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>This could be a dangerous road, I think. What should happen if a 
> >>>component implements both?
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>
> >>You are asking me??? Ask the guys who invented Resettable! :)
> >>
> >>Vadim
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>