cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Unico Hommes" <Un...@hippo.nl>
Subject RE: Status of 2.2 - Continuing?
Date Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:57:47 GMT
 

Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> 
> On 14.12.2003 14:38, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> 
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>whats the current status regarding the tree processor in 2.2?
> >>>
> >>>As the tree processor is the central component that is required to 
> >>>run cocoon and as we currently just can't start
> >>>2.2 to test/implement anything else, I think we should see that we 
> >>>get a runnable 2.2 asap.
> >>>
> >>>What do you think about just installing the tree processor
> >>
> >>from 2.1? 
> >>
> >>I was planning on working on the tree processor for 2.2 
> next week and 
> >>during the holidays. I've been extremely busy at work for 
> the past few 
> >>weeks (am in the office right now) but this will be over after 
> >>tomorrow's deadline.
> >>
> >>I don't know how long it's going to take me to get the tree 
> processor 
> >>into a workable state. The changes that need to be made are 
> extensive 
> >>so there will be a test period after things start to work 
> as well. I'd 
> >>say, I'll probably be able to put in enough time to get it working 
> >>over Xmas.
> > 
> > I'm +1 to give you the requested time frame. Have a deeper 
> look into 
> > the code and give us feedback after Xmas how long it will 
> take you. If 
> > you say it's too much time we can jump back then. I don't think we 
> > should do it now and if you say that it's too much work we 
> can install 
> > the 2.1 version then. But I don't think it is a good idea 
> to jump back 
> > right now.
> 
> Same opinion here: give Unico the time and switch back in the 
> new year if necessary (though it would not be a good start into it).
> 

It's probably only a question of how long it will take to make the tree
processor run with fortress. If someone is able to do that within a
short time frame and thinks it's worth the effort then I think they
should. 

Unico



Mime
View raw message