cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vadim Gritsenko <vadim.gritse...@verizon.net>
Subject Re: code ethics on js-java integration
Date Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:52:42 GMT
Marc Portier wrote:

>
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>> Marc Portier wrote:
>>
>>> Yo people,
>>>
>>> after the recent introduction of the WoodyPipelineConfig object, I 
>>> am tempted to change the line 125 in woody2.js
>>>
>>> see: 
>>> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/flow/javascript/woody2.js?rev=1.3&view=auto

>>>
>>> for:    bizData["woody-form"] = this.form;
>>>
>>> towards:
>>>
>>> bizData[Packages.org.apache.cocoon.woody.transformation.WoodyPipelineConfig.WOODY_FORM]

>>> = this.form;
>>>
>>> this is a natural reflex from pure Java land, but I'm left to doubth 
>>> now it this kind of more tight integration is desirable into the 
>>> js-area?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> It *is* desirable, as the JS and Java code will use this string to 
>> communicate. So it's better to have it defined in a single location.
>>
>> So +1!
>>
>
> thx for confirming...
> change underway...


PS Many tools (read: IDEA) will search in text files for your Java 
identifiers when renaming/deleting.

Vadim



Mime
View raw message