cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25517] - [PATCH] module source
Date Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:09:38 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517

[PATCH] module source





------- Additional Comments From danielf@nada.kth.se  2003-12-15 15:09 -------
For point 4): yes, it certainly makes sense to have support for XMLizable and
DOM, see http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25210 ;) I prefer
having the XML functionality in a separate source, as I can let that source be
XMLizable, which takes away one step of serializing/reparsing. I also made the
xmodule source modifiable and for the write operations it becomes more
complicated to choose in what form to store the input, so I thought it was
better to have a source that specializes to XML.

I didin't made the module source modifiable as I had no clear use cases for it,
nor was it obvious to me in what form to save the input. Any ideas?

For point 1-3 I take care of them later to day. I guess that they apply to the
xmodule source as well, so I'll fix them also.

Mime
View raw message