cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno Dumon <br...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: [cforms] add getDefinition to Widget interface?
Date Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:11:11 GMT
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 20:34, Timothy Larson wrote:
> >From the binding and other places I would like access to information
> about where widgets are defined, so it can be reported in exceptions.
> I added code to the widget definitions and builders to get and store
> this information from the DOM.  The question is whether this info
> should be retrieved from the definition directly with:
>   // This would require adding a getDefinition() method to the
>   // Widget interface and thereby exposing the definition.
>   somewidget.getDefinition().getLocation()
> or indirectly from the widget
>   // Definition shielded by widgets' getLocation() method performing:
>   //   return definition.getLocation()
>   somewidget.getLocation()
> 
> WDYT?

Until now I tried to hide the fact that widgets have an underlying
definition equivalent. I don't have any particular reason for it, except
that it might allow widgets which don't have a definition equivalent.
This is currently already somewhat the case with the RepeaterRow.

-- 
Bruno Dumon                             http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
bruno@outerthought.org                          bruno@apache.org


Mime
View raw message