Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54142 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2003 13:12:59 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2003 13:12:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 7204 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2003 13:12:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 7152 invoked by uid 500); 7 Nov 2003 13:12:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 7098 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2003 13:12:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out005.verizon.net) (206.46.170.143) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2003 13:12:41 -0000 Received: from verizon.net ([209.237.227.194]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20031107131242.CTWH1313.out005.verizon.net@verizon.net> for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 07:12:42 -0600 Message-ID: <3FAB9574.9060706@verizon.net> Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 07:52:04 -0500 From: Vadim Gritsenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] empty HTTP responses [was Re: Cannot easily set http status] References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [209.237.227.194] at Fri, 7 Nov 2003 07:12:41 -0600 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > On Thursday, Nov 6, 2003, at 14:39 Europe/Rome, Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > >> I agree with comments in this other thread that let's not introduce >> nested components in . Instead, if needed, let's introduce >> . Sometime later. > > > -1 Your -1 means: "replace later with never", right? Just to remove any possible point of confusion :) > I want to arrive to a point in the future where the ugly element > and silly usage can be thrown away without nobody whining. We will get there. Vadim