Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3983 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2003 08:53:15 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2003 08:53:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 33638 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2003 08:52:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 33512 invoked by uid 500); 5 Nov 2003 08:52:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 33481 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2003 08:52:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO otsrv1.iic.ugent.be) (157.193.121.51) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2003 08:52:50 -0000 Received: from outerthought.org (host115 [192.168.123.115]) by otsrv1.iic.ugent.be (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hA58sba30853; Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:54:37 +0100 Message-ID: <3FA8BA70.4070500@outerthought.org> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 09:53:04 +0100 From: Steven Noels Organization: Outerthought User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org CC: pmc@cocoon.apache.org Subject: current status of rhino+cont issue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all, I just wanted to quickly brief you about my talks with some board peeps so far on this matter + my personal thoughts. Some of this can be followed on the licensing list for those whose subscription is moderated through. Looking at the situation, I think the impasse is much bigger than it seems at first sight. While Chris' fork is perfectly legal, integrating the source into Cocoon CVS is a different thing: - it is not in the interest of the Cocoon TLP to host a Javascript engine implementation - and I think the ASF board has a perfectly good point there - we can not simply relicense Chris' fork without a proper donation and transfer from the Mozilla peeps (which might or might not work out) - Roy & Brian insist on exploring all possible options to remerge the changes into the proper Rhino codebase - if we succeed at this, we could explore the possibility of moving rhino++ (with our continuations stuff added to the 'real' codebase) from mozilla.org to ASF (but not to Cocoon) - which might attract a community and could be a good thing for rhino itself I'm busy ATM, but will report back if I have more news. Cheers, -- Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML An Orixo Member Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/ stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org