Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6762 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2003 09:44:34 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2003 09:44:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 3778 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2003 09:43:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 3746 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2003 09:43:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 3725 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2003 09:43:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.xs4all.be) (195.144.64.135) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2003 09:43:54 -0000 Received: from outerthought.org (195-144-088-005.dyn.adsl.xs4all.be [195.144.88.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.xs4all.be (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA29i6Ou030754; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 10:44:06 +0100 Message-ID: <3FA4D1E5.20508@outerthought.org> Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 10:44:05 +0100 From: Marc Portier Organization: Outerthought User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@cocoon.apache.org CC: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [WOODY] Form definition syntax change that affects all users References: <1067717670.26502.134.camel@yum.ot> In-Reply-To: <1067717670.26502.134.camel@yum.ot> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bruno, Could we be missing the commits on both - RepeaterDefinitionBuilder and - AggregateDefinitionBuilder? I did a recent checkout and checked over at http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/apache/cocoon/woody/formmodel/ regards, -marc= Bruno Dumon wrote: > The same is true for the repeater widget: > > > > > > > becomes > > > > > > > > > The aggregatefield widget had already a container tag, but it was called > wd:children. It should now be renamed to wd:widgets. > -- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0116284/ mpo@outerthought.org mpo@apache.org