Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-52256-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22093 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2003 20:58:16 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2003 20:58:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 47551 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2003 20:58:02 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 47512 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2003 20:58:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 47498 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2003 20:58:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO priorweb.be) (213.193.229.10)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Nov 2003 20:58:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 21491 invoked by uid 65534); 30 Nov 2003 20:58:03 -0000
Received: from p50805d4e.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.128.93.78])
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user jh@domek.be)
        by webmail.priorweb.be with HTTP;
        Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:58:03 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <2965.80.128.93.78.1070225883.squirrel@webmail.priorweb.be>
In-Reply-To: <B123DCE7-2376-11D8-ACE3-000A958B684A@outerthought.org>
References: <1507.80.128.93.78.1070189237.squirrel@webmail.priorweb.be>
    <B123DCE7-2376-11D8-ACE3-000A958B684A@outerthought.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:58:03 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: 2.0.x roadmap
From: "Jorg Heymans" <jh@domek.be>
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Reply-To: jh@domek.be
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

ok cool, just wanted a clear statement. It's not like i've come accross
loads of bugs for the 2.0.x series anyway :-)


> On Nov 30, 2003, at 11:47 AM, jh@domek.be wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> What is the actual roadmap for the 2.0.x branch? Was the 2.0.4 release
>> the
>> last of its kind or will there be more releases?
>
> You can safely regard this branch as effectively 'finished' - we might
> do a 2.0.5 release somewhere along the road, which will be mostly a CVS
> HEAD of that branch, but other than that all development focusses on
> the 2.1 and 2.2 versions. So in terms of roadmap, 2.0.x is at the end
> of its journey, unless someone has reasons to work further on it. Don't
> hold your breath, however.
>
>> I know i should probably just hop on the 2.1.x bandwagon but porting my
>> app to this release is something i cannot afford to do for the moment.
>
> What can I say?
>
> </Steven>
> --
> Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
> Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML            An Orixo Member
> Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
> stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org
>
>