Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:24:53 -0500
From: Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <javi-cocoon@ajgdg.com>
To: Vadim Gritsenko <vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net>
Cc: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: XSP "official" position
Message-ID: <20031118052453.GB12186@maribor.izzy.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Vadim Gritsenko <vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net>,
	dev@cocoon.apache.org
References: <3FB97CAB.5080401@apache.org> <3FB98BE0.7020304@verizon.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3FB98BE0.7020304@verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Vadim Gritsenko <vadim.gritsenko@verizon.net> [2003-11-18 03:03]:
> Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> 
> >Interesting comments here at ApacheCon. Some users are still convinced 
> >that we're pushing XSP as the prominent way to build interactive stuff 
> >and web applications. Actually on the site there is no particular 
> >endorsement of XSP, but there not either a word of warning about this 
> >approach being "deprecated" in favor of the flow idea. I do think that 
> >it would be nice to put some carefully thought out phrasing on the 
> >main XSP page stating that, while still supported, we do think that 
> >there are now better alternatives for dynamic websites/applications.
> >
> >WDYT?
> 
> 
> XSP if not perfect, but we still need some kind of "official" 
> templating. What's the alternatives here?

Is anyone considering XQuery?

-- 
Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu - javi@ajgdg.com