Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-51290-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 32778 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2003 10:57:42 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2003 10:57:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 87247 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2003 10:57:13 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 87078 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2003 10:57:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 87064 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2003 10:57:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos) (62.116.51.59)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Nov 2003 10:57:12 -0000
Received: From mail.at.efp.cc ([62.116.51.60]) by kerberos (WebShield SMTP
 v4.5 MR1a);
	id 1068634644116; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:57:24 +0100
Received: from WRPO (wrpo.at.intra.efp.cc [194.107.80.23])
	by mail.at.efp.cc (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id
 hACAvMX07213
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:57:23 +0100
From: "Reinhard Poetz" <reinhard@apache.org>
To: <dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [RT] ComponentizedProcessor (was RE: Migrating TreeProcessor to
 Fortress)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:56:41 +0100
Message-ID: <000a01c3a90b$a83d9b50$1e01a8c0@WRPO>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
In-Reply-To: <LKENJPKDAIKAPKHEOCMMMEDIGCAA.cziegeler@s-und-n.de>
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de] 

<snip/>

> > I'm wondering if we should write this new sitemap engine in the 2.2
> > branch or if it should go in the 2.1. Fortress isn't a 
> requirement to 
> > implement this, and it will allow us to provide views and resource 
> > inheritance before the 2.2 is out.
> > 
> I think we shouldn't change the running implementation for 
> 2.1, let's do it for 2.2 and if it is the "killer 
> implementation", we can move it to 2.1 later on anyway. But 
> for now, we should focus on 2.2 and see that we get a 
> startable cocoon version again :)

+1

--
Reinhard