Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35886 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 21:22:26 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 21:22:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 34390 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2003 21:22:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 34338 invoked by uid 500); 10 Nov 2003 21:22:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 34319 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 21:22:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos) (62.116.51.59) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 21:22:09 -0000 Received: From mail.at.efp.cc ([62.116.51.60]) by kerberos (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a); id 1068499332653; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:22:12 +0100 Received: from WRPO (wrpo.at.intra.efp.cc [194.107.80.147]) by mail.at.efp.cc (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id hAALMBX20213 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:22:12 +0100 From: "Reinhard Poetz" To: Subject: RE: [vote] forbidding flowscripts with no sendpage redirects (was Re: Saving pipeline output to a temp file...) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 22:21:31 +0100 Message-ID: <000201c3a7d0$9d0df680$1e01a8c0@WRPO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: Sylvain Wallez > Let's reformulate this into a proper vote. > > Do you want to enforce the fact that flowscript calls (either > "function" > or "continuation") *must* redirect using sendPage, sendPageAndWait or > redirectTo and that, should it not be the case, a > ProcessingException be > raised? > > [ ] no, let the sitemap execution continue after the > if there > was no redirect. > [X] yes, enforce it in 2.1.3 > [ ] yes, enforce it in 2.1.4 -- Reinhard