On Nov 4, 2003, at 2:28 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Jelly is not currently used in Cocoon. The idea is interesting, but it 
> also means a rewrite of a large part of the sitemap engine, and 
> doesn't give an immediate answer to the mixing between components and 
> container outlined by Berin.

To further my line of thought... The current object model or the 
sitemap would be converted from pseudo-objects to a more bean-like 
structure. Jelly would just replace the XXXBuilder objects, and also 
take care of managing what elements could be nested inside of others, 
etc.

> Note that I don't state this to protect the current treeprocessor, but 
> to minimize the work required to move to Fortress. Now I recognize I 
> don't know Jelly and thus how hard this would be.

Now that I brought this up, I just might have to see how easy it will 
be :)
-pete