cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sylvain Wallez <>
Subject Re: Introducing IOC for Java classes created in flowscript
Date Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:42:39 GMT
Michael Hartle wrote:

> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>> Le Jeudi, 20 nov 2003, à 18:12 Europe/Zurich, Sylvain Wallez a écrit :
>>>> ...Rhino also provides some very easy solutions to this:
>>>> -
>>>> - paragraph "JavaAdapter constructor" at 
>>> ok, cool, I wasn't aware of this, looks similar to what BeanShell does.
>>> The advantage with BeanShell is that the syntax *is* java - one can 
>>> prototype in script and later move the code to compilable classes 
>>> (just FYI - I don't mean we should switch now ;-)
>> Sounds interesting. But you know the initial requirement for any 
>> flowscript language: continuations...
> If I understood Bertrands hint towards BeanShell right, it would allow 
> the people who are affraid of writing "real" Java code to script an 
> object which is then used in the flowscript we have today - not 
> replacing the current continuation language, but easing the transition 
> for scripters towards Java for objects to be called from the flowscript.

And also the other way around: BeanShell would allow people who are 
reluctant to using server-side JS to use the familiar Java syntax. But 
once again, the first requirement is to have continuation support.


Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies 
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance  -

View raw message