cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Berin Loritsch <blorit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RT] ComponentizedProcessor (was RE: Migrating TreeProcessor to Fortress)
Date Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:02:19 GMT
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Unico Hommes wrote:
> 
>
>> Wild idea: context:/ identifies the current context, context:// 
>> identifies the root sitemap? Like in cocoon: protocol?
>>  
>>
> 
> Great idea (again!). Currently, the "context:" protocol requires the 
> double-slash and links to the root sitemap, so we can implement this 
> additional behaviour with a single slash with no compatibility break. 
> And the similarity with "cocoon:" makes it easy to understand.
> 
> This makes me think that "cocoon:" must also be be relative to the 
> "current" sitemap, and not that handling the request.

BAD IDEA.

Please, you are adding contracts to the URL spec that aren't there.
Instead I would highly encourage you to provide a way to set the base
URL where relative URLs would be resolved to.

Work *with* the contract instead of extending it in non-intuitive ways.

See my rant in another email.


Mime
View raw message