cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher Oliver <>
Subject Re: Groovy language for XSP [Fwd: [xml-dev] The Free World vs Microsoft Inc: A Closer Look At Groovy]
Date Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:30:21 GMT
Sylvain Wallez wrote:

> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> <snip/>
>> Pretty cool stuff. If they add continuations, I'm all for throwin 
>> rhino down the drain.
>> [at least, from a community perspective, we wouldn't be basing our 
>> entire architecture on branched code of a almost-dead community 
>> hosted in a location that doesn't care about java]
> Scary statement, but unfortunately so true...

I don't think that statement is true, rather I'd say it's simply FUD. 
The architecture of Cocoon is not based on Rhino. I think it has been 
shown that any language that supports continuations can quite easily be 
plugged into Cocoon. The problem is that it's hard to find such 
languages (and currently Groovy is not currently one of them). Instead 
of denigrating Rhino, why not show some appreciation for the fact that 
it does actually work. If you look at the list archives you'll see many 
postings about languages that various people feel would be better than 
Rhino (Python, Java, etc), but currently none of them actually work in 
Cocoon. If you're concerned about community support why not add the 
Rhino-with-continuations source to the Cocoon cvs. The Cocoon community 
is more than capable of maintaining it, IMO.

My $0.02,


View raw message