cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ugo Cei <>
Subject Re: [Woody] form2 XML binding example does not set id for new rows
Date Sat, 01 Nov 2003 09:43:29 GMT
Marc Portier wrote:
> nope, current binding doesn't do this.

That's clear now. From the sample, I was under the impression that the 
binding would set the "id" attribute equal to the index of the row in 
the repeater. My wrong.

> you can: make the id visible so the user can provide it though

I've tried to do this but it ends up with a document containing an empty 
list of nodes for those bound to the repeater. I've yet to investigate 
whether it's an error of mine or a bug.

In my case, actually, an ID is not needed at all. I just need to 
preserve the order of the nodes. Following the sample verbatim, it would 
just work, but the new nodes would have a spurious attribute that is not 
needed. Can I get away without specifying an ID attibute at all?

> making sense? or overlooking some essentials?

We might support some key generation strategies, if we wanted, but I'm 
not sure it's worth the effort. What we could do easily, however, is to 
give the option of specifying an attribute of the bound object to be 
filled with the index of the row in the collection, since it's already 
there, somewhere.

> hm, maybe sylvain's event-handling additions could be used to set values 
> for these?

We'll let Sylvain express himself ;-).

> -marc=

	Thanks a lot,


View raw message