cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno Dumon <br...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: [Woody-binding] wb:repeater unique-path
Date Wed, 05 Nov 2003 19:30:52 GMT
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 19:57, Bruno Dumon wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 18:51, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> > Hi:
> > 
> > I am trying to do a "form.save(bean)" from an empty displayed form.I have
> > 2 days with this sample and still not working. :-(
> > 
> > 
> > My problem is that inside the "repeater" there is only 1 value (res_id) of
> > datatype integer.
> > 
> > Binding just save the first 2 values and an empty repeater.
> 
> Is the res_id field a field that the user can edit? The current
> repeater-binding assumes that new rows are those with an empty id field
> (res_id your case). Thus if these are editable by the user and the user
> puts a value in them, the repeater binding will not detect that these
> are new rows.
> 
> However, it is of course possible to implement alternative
> repeater-binding strategies. One that's also available is
> wb:simple-repeater (see javadoc of the class
> SimpleRepeaterJXPathBindingBuilder). This binding works by first
> removing all items, and the adding all the items in the repeater.

After having a look at the source code, I'm afraid that binding
currently only works for XML documents.

-- 
Bruno Dumon                             http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
bruno@outerthought.org                          bruno@apache.org


Mime
View raw message