cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno Dumon <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] rollback Cocoon 2.2 and do Fortress merge later (was Re: Fortress Conversion Stalled)
Date Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:33:46 GMT
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 22:33, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > 
> > Sure I will. It would clearly be a bad thing to trash the time and 
> > effort Bering has put there. I may not have the required time to do it 
> > by myself, but I'm ready to answer questions. So maybe with the combined 
> > support of Berin and me we can turn this into a deeper knowledge of the 
> > sitemap engine for the whole group.
> > 
> > Berin, what's the major wall you hit in the TreeProcessor? AFAIU, 
> > Recomposable is a problem, but also something we can easily remove from 
> > the code with some light refactoring.
> > 
> > What are the other difficult points?
> The TreeProcessor has a bunch of psuedo-components that are managed differently
> than the regular container. <snip/>

Just wondering: when does a component become a pseudo-component? As long
as there is some code taking care of its lifecycle, I guess that would
be enough?

Bruno Dumon                   
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center                

View raw message