cocoon-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Reinhard Poetz" <reinh...@apache.org>
Subject [VOTE] Remove IDL-Docs (was: Documenting the FOM)
Date Mon, 03 Nov 2003 12:29:40 GMT

I propose to remove the IDL-docs because they are far from being
up-to-date and the Flow-API is well-described in our usual docs.

Here my +1.

--
Reinhard


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Reinhard Poetz [mailto:reinhard@apache.org] 
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:34 AM
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Documenting the FOM
> 
> 
> 
> From: Geoff Howard
> 
> > Reinhard Poetz wrote:
> > > From: Giacomo Pati
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>Is the idl syntax still the way to describe the FOM documentation?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > AFAIK it is far from being up-to-date. Chris added the FOM
> > description
> > > to the Control Flow documentation. I think we can remove
> > the IDL docs.
> > > 
> > > WDOT?
> > 
> > I wouldn't object.  At the very least the link off the main
> > welcome page 
> > should not describe them as the "flow docs".  They don't 
> quite cut it 
> > for the new user.
> 
> Before deleting it we should disable them by default because 
> their content is wrong. I'm not sure if I have time to do it 
> today - if somebody else has time don't wait for me.
> 
> Do we need a vote for deleting the IDL docs at all?
> 
> Reinhard
> 


Mime
View raw message