Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15215 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2003 11:44:41 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2003 11:44:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 9305 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2003 11:44:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 9260 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2003 11:44:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 9245 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2003 11:44:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2003 11:44:35 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A51sp-0007fF-00 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:44:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A51so-0007f7-00 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:44:34 +0200 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A51so-0001NM-00 for ; Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:44:34 +0200 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Subject: Re: block perspectives Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:42:05 +0200 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <3F7AE338.2080903@apache.org> <18B735D9-F4C3-11D7-AD24-000393D2CB02@apache.org> Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030923 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <18B735D9-F4C3-11D7-AD24-000393D2CB02@apache.org> Sender: news X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: ... > Because while deploying an avalon block in cocoon might make sense, > deploying a cocoon block in merlin wouldn't make any sense at all. Exactly the point. Cocoon is not a generic container, it's a very specific container, and our blocks can only work with Cocoon. What should instead be seen, is how to make Cocoon be based *on* Fortress and be usable *in* Merlin. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------