Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93591 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 13:45:34 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 13:45:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 29965 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2003 13:45:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29942 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2003 13:45:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 29920 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 13:45:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.s-und-n.de) (212.8.217.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 13:45:26 -0000 Received: from notes.sundn.de (ntsrv5.sundn.de [10.10.2.10]) by mail.s-und-n.de (postfix) with ESMTP id B7FEFB2134 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:45:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hw0386 ([10.10.2.46]) by notes.sundn.de (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8) with SMTP id 2003100915452555:20620 ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:45:25 +0200 From: "Carsten Ziegeler" To: Subject: RE: Renaming Woody to "Cocoon Forms" ? Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 15:48:04 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09.10.2003 15:45:25, Serialize by Router on PBSN1/Systeme und Netzwerke(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09.10.2003 15:45:26, Serialize complete at 09.10.2003 15:45:26 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > No matter what the result was, I think forcing people with one solution > forced discussions to happen, which helped all the parties involved, > even to understand thing that were not previously understood by both > sides. > > This is why having one official direction on the various areas is > good(tm) and having a simple name for it "cocoon sitemap" "cocoon flow" > "cocoon forms" would help our users to choose and feel more protected > and a more solid foundation. > +1 In some areas we have two or three (or more) different solutions all not satisfying the real users needs which is really crap. So, I consider this one of the most important discussions at the GT and the result might be the most important one. Carsten