Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19215 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2003 22:28:59 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2003 22:28:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 46711 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2003 22:28:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 46572 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2003 22:28:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 46554 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2003 22:28:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO terror.vuw.ac.nz) (130.195.86.25) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2003 22:28:39 -0000 Received: from [130.195.85.188] (HELO coso.staff.vuw.ac.nz) by terror.vuw.ac.nz (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9) with ESMTP id 1871128 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:33:12 +1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [RT] Improved navigation of learning objects Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:28:45 +1300 Message-ID: <5744FAECB4B8864F83CB05F2E1D16EEB18AE01@coso.staff.vuw.ac.nz> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [RT] Improved navigation of learning objects Thread-Index: AcOSi5/GoIsf/GahRRujIp0T47v/OwAFhmNA From: "Conal Tuohy" To: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > We will probably be moving the Forrest DTD to XHTML2 in one=20 > of the next=20 > things to do. As you know, there are tags that are a=20 > nice way of=20 > adding additional info in the page. >=20 > http://academ.hvcc.edu/~kantopet/xhtml/index.php?page=3Dxhtml+me > ta+content > " > Types of meta-information include: >=20 > * The contents and topics of the document. DocBook has this too - you can markup a section as relating to a topic = in some external controlled vocabulary. I think this is a good way to = relate a document or part of a document to a particular concept or set = of concepts. Stefano wrote: > > I agree that there must be some kind of automatism going=20 > on, but the > > topic creation is a human task and programs would do a=20 > terrible job at > > doing this. Nicola wrote: > It's still humans editing them, but the information can be=20 > scattered in=20 > the documents themselves. Yes ... the topics (at least the main, ontological, topics) are written = by hand, and the documents contain metadata that LINKS them to these = ontological topic. So the metadata in the docs are precisely = ASSOCIATIONS rather than topics. > > but anyway, we decided to do a first step with handwritten=20 > linkmaps. we=20 > > can move incrementally from there on. >=20 > What I see is that metadata in the docs cannot and should not totally=20 > replace a centralized bell-written site.xml, but can nicely=20 > complement it. Agree 100%. Except for the "bell-written" bit. :-)