Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34899 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2003 14:23:40 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Oct 2003 14:23:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 46161 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2003 14:23:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 46112 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2003 14:23:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 46012 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2003 14:23:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx3.nada.kth.se) (130.237.222.96) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Oct 2003 14:23:31 -0000 Received: from nada.kth.se (tophat.nada.kth.se [130.237.218.31]) by mx3.nada.kth.se (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9OENVDN021150 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:23:31 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <3F9935E3.5050704@nada.kth.se> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:23:31 +0200 From: Daniel Fagerstrom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: sv, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: [FYI] How TreeProcessor Works References: <3F992EB6.8020701@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on mx3.nada.kth.se X-Spam-Status: No,hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Did you miss Sylvains (and my) answer to your earlier question about the TreeProcessor? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106641586800001&r=1&w=2 AFAIK Sylvain has written nearly all of (or maybe all of) the TreeProcessor, Ovidiu created flowscripts together with Christopher. /Daniel Berin Loritsch wrote: > I know I want to have a new Container per sitemap, but I think I need > some > help in mapping it to this problem space. Ovideu, do you think you > could at > least spare some guidance?