Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 28317 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 12:07:20 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 12:07:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 34592 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2003 12:07:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 34399 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2003 12:07:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 34386 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 12:07:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host.leverageweb.com) (64.91.232.157) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 12:07:14 -0000 Received: from dhcp205169.hq.af.mil ([134.205.205.169] helo=leverageweb.com) by host.leverageweb.com with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1A7ZX2-00049K-00 for dev@cocoon.apache.org; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:04:36 -0400 Message-ID: <3F854F67.7040204@leverageweb.com> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 08:07:03 -0400 From: Geoff Howard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: Renaming Woody to "Cocoon Forms" ? References: <26B00A4B-FA48-11D7-AD04-000393CFE402@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <26B00A4B-FA48-11D7-AD04-000393CFE402@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.leverageweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cocoon.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [0 0] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - leverageweb.com X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote, or > am I mistaken about the agreement? > > Naming it "Cocoon Forms" is a nice parallel to "Cocoon Flow", and shows > that we're betting the farm on it, which I like. +1 > We can probably keep Woody as the block name though, in homage to the > great sandwiches delivered to the great original authors of Cocoon Forms > ;-) No, I think that block name reduces visibility. In fact, I'm starting to feel that non-descriptive names for projects are a marketing liability unless the "brand" can really be equated with its meaning. Geoff