Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51166 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2003 18:35:04 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2003 18:35:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 18568 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2003 18:34:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 18517 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2003 18:34:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 18503 invoked from network); 17 Oct 2003 18:34:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kira.skynet.be) (195.238.2.125) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Oct 2003 18:34:51 -0000 Received: from yum.ot (184.120-201-80.adsl.skynet.be [80.201.120.184]) by kira.skynet.be (8.12.9/8.12.9/Skynet-OUT-2.21) with ESMTP id h9HIYrC6031359 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:34:55 +0200 (envelope-from ) Subject: Re: [Woody] woody.js (show) woody2.js (showForm) et al From: Bruno Dumon To: dev@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: <3F8FE4AC.3080906@anyware-tech.com> References: <3F8F8FB8.7090109@internet.com.uy> <35969.10.0.0.5.1066383979.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> <3F8FBFD2.709@anyware-tech.com> <36002.10.0.0.5.1066387142.squirrel@ags01.agsoftware.dnsalias.com> <3F8FE4AC.3080906@anyware-tech.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Outerthought Message-Id: <1066415493.6405.1042.camel@yum.ot> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 20:31:34 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.3(snapshot 20030212) (kira.skynet.be) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 14:46, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > >Carlos and Bernardo said the presentation was the best that can > happen us right now. They said me you used a diferent approach in the > flows as the one used in the examples. Of course both works. > > > > Do you mean the use of the RequestMethodSelector to choose between > or ? This idea comes from > Bruno's examples using the WoodyAction and I found it very convenient as > it both avoids the weird look of kont/* URLs and the temptation for the > user to bookmark a continuation. I use the GET/POST approach because I try to follow ReSTy principles: GET retrieves a resource, POST triggers a process to modify it. Based on those same principles I would also put the continuationid in the URL, because it then identifies that continuation as a different resource. -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center bruno@outerthought.org bruno@apache.org