Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-48927-apmail-cocoon-dev-archive=cocoon.apache.org@cocoon.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 17277 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 08:14:59 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 08:14:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 24542 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2003 08:14:31 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24321 invoked by uid 500); 9 Oct 2003 08:14:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@cocoon.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24308 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 08:14:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO www2.kc.aoindustries.com) (65.77.211.84)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 08:14:30 -0000
Received: from dialup-239.147.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au
 (dialup-239.147.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au [203.220.147.239])
	(authenticated)
	by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h998Emd21991
	for <dev@cocoon.apache.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 03:14:48 -0500
Subject: Re: [site docs] build failing
From: David Crossley <crossley@indexgeo.com.au>
To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <3F851161.8030403@upaya.co.uk>
References: <3F8474CE.4090802@umn.edu> <1065669752.1899.16460.camel@ighp>
	 <3F851161.8030403@upaya.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1065687275.1899.16487.camel@ighp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) 
Date: 09 Oct 2003 18:14:37 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Upayavira wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
<snip/>
> 
> >You do get that vital hint if there are *no* broken links.
>
> Huh?

If you build a site that *has no* broken links, then you will get
a successful build, and a reminder to check the broken links file.

If you build a site that *does have* broken links, then you will get
a mention of the broken link as it goes past, and a "build failed"
message at the end. However there is no message to check the broken
links file.

> >Is that a Cocoon CLI bug or a Forrest bug?
>
> If I can understand what you're saying, maybe we can identify which.
> 
> Regards, Upayavira