Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1646 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2003 11:13:11 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2003 11:13:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 74422 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2003 11:13:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cocoon-dev-archive@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 74394 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2003 11:13:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cocoon.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: dev@cocoon.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cocoon.apache.org Received: (qmail 74380 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2003 11:13:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www2.kc.aoindustries.com) (65.77.211.84) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2003 11:13:05 -0000 Received: from dialup-51.146.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au (dialup-51.146.220.203.acc01-aubu-gou.comindico.com.au [203.220.146.51]) (authenticated) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h92BD6Z16225 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:13:06 -0500 Subject: RE: [BUG] Building docs failed From: David Crossley To: dev@cocoon.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1065093178.1900.2694.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 02 Oct 2003 21:12:59 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Joerg Heinicke wrote: > > > > I could build it with Forrest 0.5 some days ago. There was a thread about > > non-working Forrest, but WORKSFORME. > > > Great :) > > Could you please update the cocoon-site cvs module with the generated docs? > I could then update our website from the cvs. How about just updating the changes.html page? Do we really need to do the whole site. There was a discussion about not updating the website until 2.2 because the documentation was re-arranged, thereby breaking URLs. Is that still so? --David